Similar error occured while I was creating User:TheAstorPastor/VisualEditorEverywhere.js
- Queries
- All Stories
- Search
- Advanced Search
- Transactions
- Transaction Logs
Feed All Stories
All Stories
All Stories
Sun, Jan 26
Sun, Jan 26
MacFan4000 added a reverting change for rMW18d20190377f: Update LocalSettings.php: rMW6cef35ae3df5: Revert "Update LocalSettings.php".
MacFan4000 added a reverting change for rMW81b28c223c53: Update extensions: rMW20214598bb45: Revert "Update extensions".
Justarandomamerican added a reverting change for rMW18d20190377f: Update LocalSettings.php: rMW227482908878: Revert "Update LocalSettings.php".
Noticed this as well when trying to change the protection level of my user page. I have attached the error shown below.
Justarandomamerican added a reverting change for rMWe90091ee31f9: Update LocalSettings.php: rMW7716b1dd80f1: Revert "Update LocalSettings.php".
Justarandomamerican added a reverting change for rMW012d7380f296: Update LocalSettings.php: rMWb37595c5c680: Revert "Update LocalSettings.php".
GitHub <noreply@github.com> committed rMW012d7380f296: Update LocalSettings.php (authored by Justarandomamerican).
GitHub <noreply@github.com> committed rMWe90091ee31f9: Update LocalSettings.php (authored by Justarandomamerican).
UserMerge has been removed.
Sat, Jan 25
Sat, Jan 25
Thu, Jan 23
Thu, Jan 23
GitHub <noreply@github.com> committed rMW9aee2bf4640d: Update LocalSettings.php (authored by MacFan4000).
The reason no error is popping up, I assume, is because the time period for Nexovia's data has passed and it is no longer stored. However, per the most recent comment in this ticket, the UserMerge extension should be removed as it causes CU errors.
GitHub <noreply@github.com> committed rMW0264b0ac5a88: Update LocalSettings.php (authored by MacFan4000).
GitHub <noreply@github.com> committed rMWeb8d217b2a95: add TM alias (authored by MacFan4000).
I'm not getting any error when checking IPs for Nexovia, though it comes back with no results.
Wed, Jan 22
Wed, Jan 22
Per the community discussion, it will be installed for testing purposes.
Tue, Jan 21
Tue, Jan 21
Sat, Jan 18
Sat, Jan 18
Fri, Jan 17
Fri, Jan 17
In T117#2207, @MacFan4000 wrote:In T117#2182, @VancityRothaug wrote:Considering this extension would be used for community votes, I believe that a community vote to introduce it would be needed. However i would recommend that usage of all extension features is restricted to stewards to control the "validity" of the discussions carried out at Test Wiki
This - community consensus is a must.
Just checking in.....
I would be fine installing it for testing, but not for community discussion.
Thu, Jan 16
Thu, Jan 16
In T117#2182, @VancityRothaug wrote:Considering this extension would be used for community votes, I believe that a community vote to introduce it would be needed. However i would recommend that usage of all extension features is restricted to stewards to control the "validity" of the discussions carried out at Test Wiki
I'm not able to create webhooks, so probably easiest for @Justarandomamerican to configure this one as they have the proper permissions.
Wed, Jan 15
Wed, Jan 15
@Aviram7 not just sensitive rights, but also community votes such as changing of clauses etc. I strongly support this extension.
VancityRothaug awarded T117: SecurePoll Extension request a 100 token.
@MacFan4000, any update on this?
The securePoll is going to be proven very helpful for community and easy to held voting of advanced sensitive privileges.
Considering this extension would be used for community votes, I believe that a community vote to introduce it would be needed.