Per the community discussion, it will be installed for testing purposes.

In T117#2207, @MacFan4000 wrote:

In T117#2182, @VancityRothaug wrote:

Considering this extension would be used for community votes, I believe that a community vote to introduce it would be needed. However i would recommend that usage of all extension features is restricted to stewards to control the "validity" of the discussions carried out at Test Wiki

This - community consensus is a must.

I would be fine installing it for testing, but not for community discussion.

In T117#2182, @VancityRothaug wrote:

Considering this extension would be used for community votes, I believe that a community vote to introduce it would be needed. However i would recommend that usage of all extension features is restricted to stewards to control the "validity" of the discussions carried out at Test Wiki

I'm not able to create webhooks, so probably easiest for @Justarandomamerican to configure this one as they have the proper permissions.

@Aviram7 not just sensitive rights, but also community votes such as changing of clauses etc. I strongly support this extension.

@MacFan4000, any update on this?

The securePoll is going to be proven very helpful for community and easy to held voting of advanced sensitive privileges.

Considering this extension would be used for community votes, I believe that a community vote to introduce it would be needed.

In T117#2179, @VancityRothaug wrote:

While SecurePoll would be a good extension to test, I believe it would also make a good use for community discussions and its addition should be considered.

While SecurePoll would be a good extension to test, I believe it would also make a good use for community discussions and its addition should be considered.

In T117#2119, @Harvici wrote:

Much needed! Since it is heavily restricted on Wikimedia, I think it would be great for testing or even using it in community discussions

Much needed! Since it is heavily restricted on Wikimedia, I think it would be great for testing or even using it in community discussions

@MacFan4000, can you review this and see if this is something you'd want? Thanks.

Gotcha. Will install, at least temporarily.

Reopened to fulfill an active, but forever pending merge request.

Pending consensus

I'd personally like to see consensus first.

@Justarandomamerican this task is still opened

I'll work on this.

I think if this protection level and its user group is created for testing on a test wiki, we will be able to protect templates and modules as Allow template editors only. And this protection level can be set on templates and models and only users with Bureaucrat and Stewards rights will be able to grant administrator or other rights if requested for testing.

Previously added in T34. It was removed upon me making a PR on GitHub to remove it for being useless. I am unsure of the practical use of any such protection level, beyond infrequent testing.